Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-09 03:41 pm
[ SECRET POST #2503 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2503 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 05 pages, 105 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-11-10 01:27 am (UTC)(link)Seriously, unattractive does not equal ugly. Unattractive is literally "not attractive". It implies no more than that. Ugly is going beyond that all the way to the opposite end of the spectrum.
no subject
My issues is with assertion that physically fit people who take care of themselves and who don't have any shocking features can not and should not be considered ugly, based on anon's comment and comments of others in this thread.
Physically fit people who take care of themselves CAN be considered ugly- appropriately, no less- and I think it's ridiculous to say otherwise.