case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-11 06:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #2505 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2505 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 061 secrets from Secret Submission Post #358.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 16 - one persistent repeat spammer (I have tried to keep your non-repeats, however!) ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
THIS.

It's the fact that there's so few shows with female leads in the first place, the proportion of shit to quality is much higher.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-11-12 01:11 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, and even if I know the writing isn't horrible if I don't like the premise I'm still not going to watch it. Like Gilmore Girls. That was a well-ish written show. It won awards didn't it? But I didn't like it because I'm not interested in small town life unless it includes something out of the norm or other-worldly.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 02:31 am (UTC)(link)
I think with western shows in particular the premise thing is probably a big sticking point. A lot of TV execs still seem to work under the idea that women only want to see rom-coms and guys want to see action flicks, so lots of sci-fi/fantasy/action shows and movies have majority male leads, while female-led shows are probably more likely to be real-world based, love-triangle soapy things. Meanwhile most of the shows I can think of with really rabid fanbases usually have some kind of genre twist to them. Like the big namesmush of popularity, SuperWhoLock -- you've got Supernatural (which is, well, superntaural), Doctor Who (sci-fi) and Sherlock (mystery and bromance). And because fandoms for genre shows tend to be a bit more rabidly fannish than fans for regular dramas, of course the female-led shows get less love. Also explains why Xena is the only big female-led fandom OP can think of -- it's a campy action fantasy show. (Also why I think anime fandom seems to have more popular female fandoms, because you get more female-led shows that are more than just real-world romance/drama.)

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 03:33 am (UTC)(link)
"A lot of TV execs still seem to work under the idea that women only want to see rom-coms and guys want to see action flicks, so lots of sci-fi/fantasy/action shows and movies have majority male leads, while female-led shows are probably more likely to be real-world based, love-triangle soapy things."

This. I hate rom-coms. I consider myself very feminine in most ways, and I like romance in some contexts, but I do not want a bunch of shippy, soapy stuff in a sitcom, a detective/crime/thriller show, or a fantasy/sci-fi show. If I want romance and melodrama and love triangles, I will read a book or watch something like Downton Abbey.

Stuff that is specifically designed to appeal to a female demographic is guaranteed to turn me off, big-time.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 03:55 am (UTC)(link)
this.
cassandraoftroy: Chiana from Farscape, an alien with grayscale skin and hair (Default)

[personal profile] cassandraoftroy 2013-11-12 05:19 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, pretty much this. I enjoy romance just fine -- as a B-plot. I want the A-plot to involve dragons or spaceships or robots or something.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
A lot of TV execs still seem to work under the idea that women only want to see rom-coms and guys want to see action flicks, so lots of sci-fi/fantasy/action shows and movies have majority male leads, while female-led shows are probably more likely to be real-world based, love-triangle soapy thing


Thhhiiiisss these are good points. People go "oh there's plenty of shows like that" then they'll list old ones (Xena, Buffy) then a bunch of ones that I'm sure are great but I'm not interested in that kind of flick.



and I see you on superwholockhannibalwhateverelse - they're all well known popular shows...that pretty much every character is a man. I don't watch them, but I sure wish I could have some more shows with a female cast in similar genres.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 02:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Hannibal, at least...while led by men, has several female characters that seem to get a lot of love from fandom.

Freddie Lounds actually turns out to have some redeeming qualities (I kind of hate her, in the..she's a sleazy journalist sense, but she's been through other things that would make me break down crying like a baby so...)

Alana Bloom is Will's love interest but her presence on the show, while it acknowledges their attraction and there is some kissing, doesn't really center around "Alana is Will's love interest". She's a character in her own right.

Beverly Katz is on the all-male team of folks investigating these murders and she holds her own. There is in fact an episode where she isn't there (jury duty) and it's basically implied she's the one who makes sure Shit Gets Done and they need her back asap. (okay, not really implied, I think Jack yells something to that effect)

Abigail Hobbs...it's her story arc that basically drives much of the first season.

They don't have as many appearances but Dr. Du Maurier (Hannibal's therapist, played by Gillian Anderson) manages to show she can keep up with Hannibal and he obviously respects her which is not something you see out of him regarding many other characters on the show and Bella Crawford (Jack's wife, played by Gina Torres)...just packs a punch whenever she's on the screen. (a metaphorical punch) The first time we see her, she's on screen for like...all of fifteen seconds, and even that is enough to make you go, "holy crap." Or at least it did for me.
forgottenjester: (Default)

[personal profile] forgottenjester 2013-11-12 05:04 am (UTC)(link)
Everything you've just said is something I can agree with. I'm really not interested in romcoms or anything like that so I feel like the only thing available to me have male leads.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-12 10:30 am (UTC)(link)
It's not just TV though - I always hate it when a good action(or sci-fi) movie only has a female character to be the love interest. Because we absolutely need a love story so the girls who accompany their boyfriends to that movie don't get bored, right?

Really, if that's the only reason to stick in a female character, I'd rather have no female character at all.