Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-16 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2510 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2510 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 092 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?
(Anonymous) 2013-11-16 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?
http://youtu.be/_v2exWrsGOc
Not trolling, if there's something I'm missing, explain it to me. "Be done seen" and grammar as such works for the time, yes? Cliff Edwards being one of the crows seems more problematic casting then something specifically about the character he played.
Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?
Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?
Re: Was dumbo really that problematic?