Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-16 03:47 pm
[ SECRET POST #2510 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2510 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 092 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Writing characters of color while showing not telling and not pissing people off
Really, where problems arise with describing skin color is when you only describe skin that is dark and leave anything else unspoken, creating an effect of making dark skin exceptional and every other skin type the default. Toss in some descriptors for non-dark people here and there where relevant - "pale", "fair", and "light" are favorites of mine. "Tanned" for pale/light brown skin that's been, well, notably tanned (try not to apply that to brown skin that's that way without sun, it makes people confused). I personally avoid food descriptors, but they're not a crime in and of themselves, just incredibly overdone for every skin color ("milky" needs to die a sudden death).
Good luck!