Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-11-17 04:01 pm
[ SECRET POST #2511 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2511 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Hobbit]
__________________________________________________
03.

[The Fly 1986]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Slightly Damned]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Game Of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
06.

[DC Comics]
__________________________________________________
07.

[NCIS]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Roosterteeth]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Mass Effect]
[Art: The Shepard Siblings, by bigcman321]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Easy A]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Sleepy Hollow]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Sir David Attenborough]
__________________________________________________
13.

[New Tricks]
__________________________________________________
14.

[Hannibal (NBC)]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 01:51 am (UTC)(link)So, you're right on the definition of pan, and a bit off on the definition of bi, but it's not your fault; "pan" people have been campaigning to redefine "bi" to mean "gender binary only" so that they can score extra brownie points and be ~more oppressed~ than those binary-loving scum who call themselves bisexual.
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 02:20 am (UTC)(link)The really sad part about it all is that, because of this problem, there basically isn't an easy term for that that won't cause people to eat you alive. If you say you're bisexual, someone is going to shit on you because oooh that's transphobic blah blah blah. If you say you're pansexual, someone is going to shit on you because oooh that's a stupid special snowflake term blah blah blah.
Sorry, I'm quite bitter towards the pansexual crowd because when I came out it was so easy, I could say "I'm bisexual" and everyone would understand. Now I can't use a nice single-word explanation without getting insulted because other people of my same sexual orientation decided that's not good enough. I have reverted to explaining in the long-winded way. Truly a victory for everyone, assholes.
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 02:50 am (UTC)(link)Aaaaaannnnd this is why I don't want to come out as bi yet.
The reaction from friends & family is terrifying enough, without the thought that the lesbian & gay community will hate me, too.
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 03:15 am (UTC)(link)And THIS is why over-labelling is bad!
Good luck, anon-person. I hope that when you do come out you find yourself among the supportive and the strong, rather than the petty and pedantic. *hugs!*
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)I can absolutely understand that. :( I've been extremely lucky that not a single person between my family and friends has been anything but supportive, but people on Tumblr? Yipes. The most vitriolic things I've heard were from people of my same age who are queer themselves; meanwhile, my 81-year-old grandma is cheering for me and my girlfriend. Makes you think...
Good luck, anon!
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 03:48 am (UTC)(link)Then, I've never met a single bisexual person who said 'nope, just cis people please, and definitely no one who's genderqueer.'
I'm sure they exist, but it's in no way inherent to the definition of bisexuality. I'm actually genderqueer myself, and I get more and more annoyed by the ever-growing list of things I'm supposed to be offended about just so that some people get an extra special tumblr label.
Re: Somewhat related question
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-18 11:44 am (UTC)(link)Re: Somewhat related question
Though I do agree that the two-ness of the term "bisexual" doesn't fully include intersex and genderfluid people, but that's an etymological concept, not a matter of attraction.
Pansexual might be a better word to describe the phenomena, but the attitudes flying around make both terms sort of unpleasant.
(P.S. The Pan which comes to my mind when I see the word is the Pan with the horns and the pipes and the goat legs, not the ones with the eggs and the frying)
Re: Somewhat related question
(Anonymous) 2013-11-19 08:39 am (UTC)(link)I'm sure I could put together a bunch of special snowflake labels to describe my sexual preferences exactly, but in the end, that's between me and people who mutually want to have sex with me and they don't need to know which of my imaginary sexytimes checkboxes they tick off any more than I need to know which of theirs I do.