case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-20 06:34 pm

[ SECRET POST #2514 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2514 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.










Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 033 secrets from Secret Submission Post #359.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Is the wank against the headcanons themselves? No, seriously asking here...

(Anonymous) 2013-11-21 05:25 am (UTC)(link)
I've seen people lashing out against trans headcanons when said headcanon just consists of attaching random labels to the character and nothing else. For example, a post saying that Tony Stark is a homosexual demi-romantic femme trans man who is dating Pepper the asexual genderfluid trans woman. Other than that it's mostly like the above poster said and the backlash is against people who think you're a bigot for not sharing your headcanon.