[ SECRET POST #2518 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2518 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: OP here

[writerserenyty]

What about console games? I play pretty much every game I'm interested on PCs due to patience and gaming sales. I pay attention to Steam, GMG, GoG, etc. But I really can't justify paying hundreds for a PS3 (and now a PS4) for the few exclusives I really want to play/experience.

I agree that interactivity is the core of many games (that's part of what makes stuff like The Walking Dead and The Wolf Among Us favorites of mine) but that's not the case for ALL games, and I don't think people HAVE to experience that to enjoy some of the story. Say you want the story for a pretty linear game, Assassin's Creed for example. What makes the gameplay experience necessary for experiencing that story.

And oh yeah, your personal experiences totally represent everyone everywhere. /sarcasm

Re: OP here

[(Anonymous)]

This.

Assassin's Creed is a great example, because many of the installments came out on many different platforms and something tells me less than 1% of fans played them all.