case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-24 04:02 pm

[ SECRET POST #2518 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2518 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-11-25 12:05 am (UTC)(link)
It seems like there are two extremes in how fandom deals with villains (or even with morally grey characters who aren't necessarily evil). Either they're vilified to the point of being completely soulless monsters who are incapable of caring about anyone, or they're woobified into misunderstood little things who shouldn't be blamed for the bad things they do because of their ~tragic past~ (coughcoughLokicough).

That being said, I'm pretty sure Hannibal Lecter is actually as evil as people think he is. ;) But you're right, OP, fandom also does this to villains who are less evil.