[ SECRET POST #2518 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2518 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 060 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[mechanosapience]

I think you could argue either way, and while--as a thread above points out--the creators intended Gothel to not care for Rapunzel as a person but as a possession, I think that simplification was necessary. I've seen a lot of people, here and elsewhere, argue that the maternal behavior of Gothel isn't abusive or even bad. And that's with the creators deliberately setting out to (subtly, admittedly) remove any moral ambiguity from Gothel as a character.