[ SECRET POST #2519 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2519 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[lotesse]

oh for fuck's sake. some of us like our porn driven by unique characterizations and bodies; some of us aren't into cookie-cutter pornopretty. you will also notice that many many many fat, bald, and/or both people have sex in the real world. sometimes hot, kinky, wild, passionate sex. amazingly enough, the elasticity of human erotogeneity means that there's going to be someone out there who finds any given thing you can imagine hot, whether you do or not.

in short: no1curr, not all porn meant to cater to your particular tastes. which seem so common that I can scarcely believe you have a hard time finding fap material.

[(Anonymous)]

I'd agree....except for how the OP specifically SAYS that s/he isn't talking about porn where the imperfections are an important aspect of the story/scene, just about porn where the mention of imperfections has no point to it.

[(Anonymous)]

I'm willing to bet OP thinks any mention of imperfections "has no point." Some of us want the realism, and that's enough of a reason to include it.

[lotesse]

my point was that perfection and imperfection are relative terms. i am not interested in big dicks, and often find them a turn-off because OUCH, personally speaking. many pornographic pieces explicitly mention penis size in a way that does not appeal to me. i do like thick women, aesthetically speaking, so mentioning a woman's full figure does appeal to me. some people like baldness, or like a certain character's baldness (skinner? picard? with HAIR? do not want); a mention of baldness in a sex scene might not be pointless for them, it might be deeply and essentially pointy. difference and diversity of view aren't a bug in sexuality terms, they're a feature.

[(Anonymous)]

Your comments here are flawless.

[lotesse]

ta very much :)

[thistlechaser]

I like this comment. I like you.