case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-11-25 06:50 pm

[ SECRET POST #2519 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2519 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 049 secrets from Secret Submission Post #360.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
intrigueing: (buffy eww)

[personal profile] intrigueing 2013-11-26 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
I don't know about that. Perhaps "by the standards of the time" he wasn't, but Watson explicitly describes him as being more misogynistic than was the norm in "A Scandal in Bohemia" and "The Dying Detective", and in The Sign of Four, his opinion of Holmes's "ribbing" is to tell the reader that he was in too much of a hurry to stop and argue with such an "atrocious sentiment." So Holmes was considered sexist at least by Watson's standards. (Which admittedly might have been somewhat more progressive than the norm -- given Watson's other opinions concerning divorce, race, drugs, colonial warfare, American Politics, etc, it would be pretty IC for him -- but he still wasn't exactly some kind of radical.)

However yes, Holmes was never actually nasty with women. He never dismissed or devalued his female clients either, except that one time at the end of A Case of Identity.