case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-01 03:53 pm

[ SECRET POST #2525 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2525 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.












Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-12-02 01:22 am (UTC)(link)
Can't really say anything to that OP, but I do know that this fandom is the winner for reading into subtext and explaining away tiny plot holes. I just saw a full length essay on why it's realistic for John to ask for money from Sherlock. And there was that post about Sherlock having Asperger's where the writer consulted several psychologists ... do these people really not have anything better to do with their time and resources? The Asperger's one I can kind of understand, but the minor stuff ... eh.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-02 01:36 am (UTC)(link)
That's nothing compared to what Holmes-fans have been writing about for year. I've seen passionate essays on whether it was Sax Codurg Street or Saxe Codburg Street and where exactly it really is (seriously, there's an essay called 'The Case of the Missing 'E' in one of the issues of the Baker Street Journal) and that pales in comparison to the location-buffs who painstakingly argue over canonical locations.

badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-12-02 01:45 am (UTC)(link)
Oh my, and I thought Decoding the Subtext was bad! I can understand arguing over characterisation, but the spelling of a location?! There really are all kinds of people out there.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-02 01:53 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

Tbf, these kinds of essays are mostly REALLY tongue-in-cheek -- they're more excuses to do really random history-buff research than to achieve some goal ;)
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-12-02 02:46 am (UTC)(link)
Of course, I do them too. But it's the length and depth of thought that apparently goes into such little things that surprises me.
akacat: A cute cat holding a computer mice by the cord. (Default)

[personal profile] akacat 2013-12-02 04:51 am (UTC)(link)
I think it's kind of funny that both of the essay you mention were written by the same person.
badass_tiger: Charles Dance as Lord Vetinari (Default)

[personal profile] badass_tiger 2013-12-02 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
Oh were they? I didn't notice the author's name, those were just the two I saw the most recently

(Anonymous) 2013-12-02 11:28 am (UTC)(link)
From what I recall the person who writes them is medical student (possibly final year) so maybe they're doing that "I want to think about something other than..." thing we all do when up to our elbows in real work.