Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-06 06:50 pm
[ SECRET POST #2530 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2530 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13. http://i.imgur.com/sXm4j5b.gif
[Doctor Who (gif)]
__________________________________________________
[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
14. [SPOILERS for family guy]

__________________________________________________
15. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________
[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
16. [WARNING for abuse]

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #361.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
(Anonymous) 2013-12-07 12:52 am (UTC)(link)Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
(Anonymous) 2013-12-07 02:22 am (UTC)(link)Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
(Anonymous) 2013-12-07 02:36 am (UTC)(link)That's my assumption anyway but honestly, it's never really bothered me that much. It's really probably less realistic that it didn't really happen to more main characters - there should probably have been more turnover on the show than there was. Shit happens.
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
Anyway, that's what I theorize happened to Mandy -- I'm just pissed it wasn't in the episode.
My answer to that the eternal question of old cranky Sherlockians -- was Watson's "bull pup" a gun, a dog, or a quick temper -- is that it was a quick temper.
But wait! you say. Watson never had a quick temper in canon!
Well no, and that's exactly it: he said those are the principal vices at present, because he has another set of vices when he's well. Which was evidently true, because none of the other vices he listed ever came up again either, because they were all directly connected to his having been at war. And having mood swings/fits of temper/irritability is one of the most common symptoms of PTSD, so no doubt it was a vice that wore off when his mental health improved, along with laziness and waking up in the middle of the night and hating noise.
However, I am now very curious about what that "other set of vices" was...
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
(Anonymous) 2013-12-07 03:44 am (UTC)(link)I'd guess that gambling and womanizing were two of them. And ogling other men's wives :D
What else would be in-character for him? Maybe he reads books while he walks and smashes into people while trying to stroll down the street? Maybe he carries a notebook everywhere and constantly scribbles down everything he hears?
Re: Theories/headcanons about canonical mysteries
(Anonymous) 2013-12-07 03:55 am (UTC)(link)