case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-08 03:47 pm

[ SECRET POST #2532 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2532 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.







Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 065 secrets from Secret Submission Post #362.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-08 10:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, the not-talking definitely helps. In addition to being cuter, I think part of the reason it works better is because there are fewer links in the chain and fewer chances for it to fail. With a talking character, you have someone setting the scene, possibly a different someone writing the actual dialogue, someone delivering the lines, someone storyboarding/animating the scene to match the lines, and all of the editors and directors giving their input. With a nonverbal character, you have someone setting the scene and just handing it straight to the artists whose entire job is "make this non-human thing seem alive/human" and then passing it to the editors and directors.