Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-11 11:01 pm
[ SECRET POST #2535 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2535 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 026 secrets from Secret Submission Post #362.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Seriously, I know what you mean, but clothing-porn often makes one's writing ridiculous (as do regular super lengthy descriptions! Not everyone is Honore de Balzac, and all that your writing about "the marble column of his neck" does is make me huff with laughter). A couple of nice details thrown in? Gorgeous, gimme more. Actual lengthy descriptions?.. nno. Remember, in period pieces, especially if they are written from the perspective of an in-universe character, the ~super exotic Victorian/Edwardian/Regency underwear~ would be seen the way we see, IDK, expensive jeans or shirts with unusual prints. Fancy, yeah. Cool, maybe. Worthy of a whole paragraph of descriptions? Hell no.
But I do like it when people actually mention some clothes worn in a particular time period. Especially if it's done in passing, so as to remind the reader that the setting is there without making it too obvious.