case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-13 07:07 pm

[ SECRET POST #2537 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2537 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.
[MLP]


__________________________________________________



02.
[NiGHTS into Dreams]


__________________________________________________



03.
[MLP]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Sleepy Hollow]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Mabinogi]


__________________________________________________



06.
[the hollows/rachel morgan]


__________________________________________________



07.
[MLP/fallout: equestria]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Collar 6]


__________________________________________________









[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]









09. [SPOILERS for Catching Fire]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Ludo's Broken Bride CD]



__________________________________________________



11. [SPOILERS for Monster Girl Quest]



__________________________________________________











[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]











12. [WARNING for sexual assault]

[Glee]


__________________________________________________



13. [WARNING for abuse]

[MLP]


__________________________________________________



14. [WARNING for non-con]

[MLP]


__________________________________________________













Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #362.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Little fandom opinions that are too minor or uncontroversial to submit as secrets

(Anonymous) 2013-12-14 12:50 am (UTC)(link)
I'm really annoyed at Sherlock Holmes fans who try to insist that various little parts of Elementary/BBC/Ritchie is exactly like canon. Not so much the fact that they're usually transparently twisting facts for their own benefit, but also 1. "canon" is very subjective due to the way the stories are framed, so in a looooooot of cases, "this COULD be canon" =/= "this IS canon"; and 2. why is it assumed that more similar to canon = better, just ipso facto?