case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-14 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2538 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2538 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-14 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I think, personally, it's a matter of the silliness not being done well, and a really rough combination of "serious" and kiddish that PJ just didn't iron out. He's pushing kid humor in a violent PG13 movie. Not that the atmosphere of the book should've been cut, it just should've been adapted better, imo, and it just didn't work for me. And I like the book well enough. But in the movie series, I get wanting to balance it with the depth of the LOTR movies. Still, I think both Hobbit movies have overall been kinda garbage... with humor not being the worst of their problems.

on another note: ugh, Radagast..
dreemyweird: (austere)

[personal profile] dreemyweird 2013-12-14 11:30 pm (UTC)(link)
I can understand that! It's just a problem of overall quality, really. If you have issues with the films not because of silliness per se but because of how it was introduced, then I doubt they would have appeared better without it.

(that being said, IDK. I liked the films a lot. Not nearly as much as the book, but I felt like all the necessary elements were there. Eh, different strokes)