case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2013-12-14 04:00 pm

[ SECRET POST #2538 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2538 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 079 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2013-12-15 03:31 am (UTC)(link)
I think you hit the nail on the head with the "who's the man" thing. So much slash (and some femslash, but I've seen less of this) still sticks to this weird rigid gender categorization? Like not only are bottoms/more passive types/submissives always bottoms/passive/submissive, but they're the "girly" one, too. And they probably cry more, or something.

Which is totally bonkers, because even in het relationships with two gender-normative people, these things are not this ultra cut-and-dry. (Seriously, I am a pretty girly girl, and I have "topped" some macho military dudes in my time.)