[ SECRET POST #2541 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2541 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.


__________________________________________________



12.









Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 040 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[(Anonymous)]

But the question isn't whether girls buy those action figures; the question is whether an economically significant number of girls buy those action figures. And CN's answer to that question is clearly no.

I think they're mostly likely wrong, fwiw - I think that girls do buy action figures if you make the right ones and don't market them stupidly, and I think it's really dumb to focus on those kinds of toys and not think about branching out of merchandise. But, I mean, they have the statistics, and they know their financial position, and we don't. Maybe they're being total dumbasses. IDK.

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[insanenoodlyguy]

They are and they aren't. They aren't wrong when they say an economically signficant number of girls dont' buy what they have out now.

The problem is they are terrified of going outside of their current model where they can correctly predict some gains, and risking a new model that could result in losses.

Of course, doing that too conservatively is why CN's golden age is behind it. For god's sake, they tried to go live action. Remember CN real?

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[(Anonymous)]

Or it could be that they're not terrified, or stupid - maybe their margins aren't high enough to allow them to start trying to create a new model. Maybe their parent company forces them away from moving to a model that can sell merchandise to girls in favor of going after higher profits right now because that's all their parent company cares about.

My point is that we don't know what their statistics are and we don't know their financial situation. It's really easy, in a vacuum, to say that they should do x, but we don't know if they're not doing it because they're stupid or malicious, or because there's some other factor.

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[insanenoodlyguy]

... but that's what Paul Dini was talking about. Did you actually read the interview he had?

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[(Anonymous)]

Nope. It wasn't linked and I don't care enough to google it.

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[chardmonster]

Then your opinion's pretty much shit.

Re: The Paul Dini+tumblrVSCN clusterfluff

[(Anonymous)]

I am unrepentant!