Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-21 03:35 pm
[ SECRET POST #2545 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2545 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 070 secrets from Secret Submission Post #363.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 03:02 am (UTC)(link)Well that seems to be ignoring the opposite phenomenon of "you're not a real man until you've had sex" mentality. Is it that a vagina is so important that it literally changes a boy into a man?
Re: not a virgin
Whatever. Men who are obsessed with their virginity are really immature and WAY more of a turn-off than men who are virgins. Managing to plead and obsess your way into finishing having sex once SO does not magically make you into a better sexxor than a man who has had actual experience and experimentation with his sexuality and his partners' for the pleasure of experiencing it at a pace that suits him, and just hasn't gotten all the way yet.
Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 03:19 am (UTC)(link)Re: not a virgin
Re: not a virgin
Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 07:39 am (UTC)(link)Re: not a virgin
Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 08:42 am (UTC)(link)Wouldn't that prove counter to the original line of reasoning?
I.E. if the original idea that Penises are so awesome that they change the lives of women forever, wouldn't that change serve to increase the woman's value?
I mean, in both situations sex changes the value of the people involved, so if the male value increases after having experienced vagina, and the female value decreases after having experienced penis, well then wouldn't that imply the PVAE (Penis-Vagina Awesome Exchange) favour the female genitals?
I might not be making sense, it is very early and I am without coffee.
Re: not a virgin
And, the reason why you're not making much sense is because the whole thing doesn't make sense, which is pretty much my point. The "he's a stud, she's a slut" double standard is party of why virginity is such a stupid and fucked up concept - it attached value to the status of (not) having had sex.
For another perspective, take a look at purity balls. Young girls promise not to let themselves get tainted by sex, but young men promise not to taint women/"someone's future wife" with sex - if they had sex, they would not be tainted. Only girls get tainted by sex.
Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 06:10 am (UTC)(link)Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 06:13 am (UTC)(link)Re: not a virgin
(Anonymous) 2013-12-22 06:18 am (UTC)(link)typical MRA derailing bullshit.