Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2013-12-28 04:21 pm
[ SECRET POST #2552 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2552 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
Secret 4 - The Hobbit (movies), the dwarves
I'm normally pretty open to Alternate Universes, but browsing Hobbit movie fic, I despise every single Alternate Universe I find. I think I've figured out why.
It's because despite paragraph-long studio blurbs, the Hobbit dwarves (besides Thorin) are barely two-dimensional. Even Bilbo's a bit thin. Knowing where the dwarves are from and where they're going, you can find some depth in them from context. Without their history, they're nothing.
Unrelated: Kili/Fili is the new J2.
Notes
Re: Secret 4 - The Hobbit (movies), the dwarves
(Anonymous) 2013-12-28 10:39 pm (UTC)(link)The last bit is supposed to be 'Unrelated Kili/Fili is the new J2', as in, fics pairing those two characters while making them unrelated (thus removing the only shred of characterization they have and reducing them to a couple pretty faces).
Re: Secret 4 - The Hobbit (movies), the dwarves
no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-12-28 10:38 pm (UTC)(link)Actually I don't know. There's an amazing variety of horrifying AUs, which is... nice?
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 12:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 01:19 am (UTC)(link)no subject
OP
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 05:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
It's not that they're inherently bad. I'm just confused by the prevalence. (Although I will take the glut of Coffee Shop AUs over the glut of Alpha/Omega ones...)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-28 09:58 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 12:18 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I specify those two because they actually preserve some of the original backgrounds and the reasons why the characters are who they are.
But mostly I prefer AUs that change a detail and explore how that makes things different.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 03:06 am (UTC)(link)I'm sorry, my character is just not my character if they're a barista.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2013-12-29 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)