[ SECRET POST #2552 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2552 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 077 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[dreemyweird]

I'm the opposite.

But that's probably because for me, the personality of the creator is of utmost importance, and I stop liking their stuff if I see that they're a dick. Actually, I normally don't like their stuff in the first place (because the dickishness never fails to find its way into their works), but seeing them being dicks reinforces my intuition.

And if the creators are good folks, then, why, I'm happy. Plus, I love hearing everything they have to say. I'm not a fan of Death of the Author (unless we are talking formal academical analysis, in which case that's the norm).

[(Anonymous)]

I mostly agree, but what do you think about creators who are mostly mysterious?

[(Anonymous)]

dmw here

I don't mind it (especially seeing as one of the most important figures in the history of literature is as damn mysterious as it gets). I just make do with what I have, making some guesses as to the personality of the creator based on their work.