[ SECRET POST #2557 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2557 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.



__________________________________________________


11.














Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 01 pages, 013 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

You are friends with homophobes? Why the hell have you not ditched those guys? Homophobic yourself perhaps?

[(Anonymous)]

This comment is really strange combined with the fact you are screaming about SJWs in another thread.

[(Anonymous)]

They're a troll. Do not look for or expect consistency. You will only hurt your brain, and they will win.

[(Anonymous)]

Ahhh. Suddenly it all makes sense.

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

I'm a complicated person, full of contradictions and likings for one cause and dislikes of other similar causes. Those inherent contradictions make me a pretty normal human being, but because of those I'd be a lousy hard SF character. I can see OSC's homophobia loud and clear mainly, I can't see what the SJWs beef with Moffat is. They have some pretty twisted logic to get to their conclusions.

[(Anonymous)]

...I can't see the SJWs beef about Moffat, either. If anything concentrate on the painfully obvious fact the man can't plot his way out of a paper bag.

[(Anonymous)]

I see you missed the part where they LITERALLY JUST SAID their friends went into Ender's Game without knowing anything about it

and incidentally, Orson Scott Card's a homophobic dickhole but that doesn't make it not a great book.

[(Anonymous)]

Sadly, it does color ones view of it and even sadder later books show signs of Cards way of "thinking".

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

Once you realize that "buggers" is slang for homosexuals then it starts to make a lot of sense regarding OSC's worldview. He isn't the first author to use obscure slang to get the identity of his real targets under the radar.

[(Anonymous)]

Have you read the book? P sure that's not the ending he'd have written if he had actually meant homosexuals.

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

Its a shit book even without knowing that the author is a dickhead. All it is is a manifesto for maladjusted nerds to "prove" to others that they really are supposed to be better than everyone around them.

[(Anonymous)]

How do you figure they're homophobes? Based on one singular movie they enjoyed? Seems like flimsy reasoning.

[bringreligiontothewamwams]

They put money into the pocket of a homophobe who publicly stated he'd be using that money for homophobic causes (and also propogated a lie saying that he wouldn't be getting any further monies from that movie despite having a producer's credit and planning on using the movie to sell more of his works to the movie industry) and enjoyed a homophobes work. There really isn't any gray there, its pretty black and white. Everyone who went to see that movie was a homophobe, the only difference is some of them admitted it and some of them tried to weasel out of the charge.

[(Anonymous)]

Ah, you're one of those people.

[(Anonymous)]

The more thye talk, the more there WHAAA SJWS thing in the doctor who thread makes even less sense.

[(Anonymous)]

They're a troooolllll and they are getting so very fattened up in this thread. :|

[feotakahari]

On the artistic side of things: I forget the names, but aren't there a couple of poets from the '30s who're still read and enjoyed despite having openly supported Adolf Hitler? Granted, buying their books doesn't mean funding Neo-Nazis, so let me switch tacks to deal with that.

On the moral side of things: there's a decent chance you're typing on a computer made with minerals that financed the Second Congo War. I wouldn't accuse someone of being a warmonger for not tracking where the minerals came from.

[lilacsigil]

Ezra Pound is the poet you're thinking of.

[(Anonymous)]

Card's homophobia isn't as well know as you'd think. A *lot* of people are unaware of his grossness.