case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-03 07:20 pm

[ SECRET POST #2558 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2558 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.
[Frozen]


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.
[Cabin in the Woods]


__________________________________________________



06.
[Trailer Park Boys]


__________________________________________________



07. [posted twice]


__________________________________________________















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]














08. [SPOILERS for Elementary]



__________________________________________________



09. [SPOILERS for Zelda comic]



__________________________________________________



10. [SPOILERS for Breaking Bad]


















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]
















11. [SPOILERS for Dan and Mab's Furry Adventures]
[WARNING for suicide]

















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #364.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ], [ 1 - take it to comments ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: AYRT

(Anonymous) 2014-01-04 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
Is it, though? The kind of thinking where you justify an act that looks very inexcusable from an outside perspective tends to be the kind of thinking that's surprisingly pervasive. It's sort of like saying that someone is a great person, but occasionally they do this out of character thing and rob a convenience store. But! They have a good reason for doing so* and they're not really at fault even though they took the money. Is the person who stole a good person who had this weird glitch about robbery, or are they a thief who mostly manages to behave themselves?

I could see a justification for your friends dating a person who's cheating, but calling it a blameless act is maybe pushing it a little far. Nothing that you have the choice to NOT do that results in so much pain is blameless.


* For this analogy to work we must assume that this reason isn't stealing out of sheer necessity, because your friends don't need to have a relationship with a person in a committed monogamous relationship, they choose to do so.