[ SECRET POST #2560 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2560 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[intrigueing]

Meh. IA with uour assesment of it as an AU with an OOC Holmes, but I honestly DGAF if people be creative with Sherlock Holmes adaptations -- go nuts I say. It's one of those things where playing around is a lot of fun because the concept of Sherlock Holmes is bigger than the stories. The only thing that pisses me off is when people claim creative adaptations are just like canon. Since the Ritchie movies' fandom has never pretended to be just like like canon (unlike some other adaptations' fandoms I could name) they're a-okay with me. Why should I ruin other people's fun by whinging about ~the sanctity of canon~? I just kinda wish the movies were, well, better.

Also um...how many movies have you seen with rdj, out of curiosity?