[ SECRET POST #2560 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2560 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 1 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: ...was this EVER supposed to be a 'true' Sherlock Holmes adaptation?

[intrigueing]

Yeah kinda this, though the movies were pretty damn thin on plot and put much more emphasis on the personal relationship between the leads. Maybe more like a Victorian-era buddy cop movie?

But IA on the not being intended to be like canon. They were pretty aggressively marketed as "not your grandfather's Sherlock Holmes" or whatever. They definitely wanted to be more the anti-Rathbone, or the anti-20-different-low-budget-movie-adaptations-of-the-Hound-of-the-Baskervilles -- to counterbalance the pop-cultural influence of the old stodgy stereotypes of Sherlock Holmes by exaggerating in the opposite direction.

I do get a kick out of them, mostly for Watson the little things and the sense of fun and energy and not taking themselves too seriously, not so much for the so-called plots/mysteries, which are...well, rather shitty. But then again, I also get a kick out of stuff like Murder by Decree and The Seven Per Cent Solution, so take that as you will.