fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2565 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2565 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

__________________________________________________

03.

__________________________________________________

04.

__________________________________________________

05.

__________________________________________________

06.

__________________________________________________

07.

__________________________________________________

[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

08. [SPOILERS for Shingeki no Kyojin / Attack on Titan]

__________________________________________________

09. [SPOILERS for The Walking Dead]
http://i.imgur.com/Rnp3pTB.png
[gore in image]

__________________________________________________

10. [SPOILERS for American Horror Story]

__________________________________________________

11. [SPOILERS for Doctor Who]

__________________________________________________

12. [SPOILERS for Sherlock]
http://i.imgur.com/d4tbog4.png
(OP requested link)

__________________________________________________

13. [SPOILERS for Sherlock]

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #366.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

And what, exactly, do you know about the author's life? His emotional response to this issue may have roots in a real life experience.

I didn't think of that. Like I said above, the way it's said still bothers me. But it would be more understandable if he had that kind of experience.

He also might not.

"Maybe X has happened to Y" doesn't make Y an expert, above reproach, or A Speaker For All. It certainly shouldn't be an effective tactic for shaming someone with a differing opinion than your own into apologies or silence. And regardless of whether or not a thing may have happened to the author, it doesn't put his work beyond criticism, on this or any other topic, because this comic strip is not his personal diary. It's something that he's willingly releasing into the world for public consumption (and maybe cash.)

So even though real life people left behind by suicide often feel deeply angry about it, no one should write any character being angry or upset because it might upset someone? Did you miss the person just a few comments up talking about her own anger dealing with her father's suicide?

Not to mention that real-life people left behind by a suicide are not infrequently left with PTSD and are at increased risk for suicide themselves. And often have to deal with people pointing fingers and telling them that it wouldn't have happened had they been a better parent/sibling/friend.

I would like to see professional sources for your assertions. And know what it has to do with my original comment or the above poster's response to it.

Did I say that I wanted to control how people depict characters dealing with suicide? No, I did not. I said that it's okay to not like an author's narrative choices since the critic is criticizing the author's professional work, not the author's personal therapy journal.

And, while I certainly respect the above poster's courage in discussing such a difficult and personal topic, the above poster is also not a Speaker For All when it comes to reactions to this sort of thing. That was the poster's individual reaction and certainly not a "everyone feels like me!" post. So stop acting like it was.

Considering how the OP said that they were "sickened" by the characters' reactions to Faye's father's suicide, you can understand why people want to defend this depiction of the after affects of a family member's suicide.

The OP was (intentionally or not) invalidating people's (understandable) feelings. Dealing with a family member's suicide is difficult enough without someone telling you that your feelings "sicken" them.

OP is, like everyone else, allowed to have feelings and opinions. And, if OP is sickened by the depiction of a response to grief, that's fine. Maybe OP's emotional nexus works differently. Or maybe, that same response but written by a different writer, wouldn't have the same effect.

Either way, OP wasn't calling a particular poster out and saying "YOU! YOU THERE! YOUR RESPONSE TO YOUR PERSONAL AFFAIRS SICKEN ME!" OP was commenting on a comic that apparently bothers OP.

Invalidating one person in an after-the-fact attempt to prop someone up, especially someone who was explaining their thoughts rather than asking for anon white knights, has no net gain. It does nothing for either person, especially when you're conflating two unrelated things - OP's reaction to a comic as a consumer of that comic which has nothing to do with Responder and Responder's personal opinions, other than that Responder apparently wanted to discuss it with OP.

[ SECRET POST #2565 ]

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide

Re: cw: rl suicide