Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-14 07:06 pm
[ SECRET POST #2569 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2569 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

[The Little Mermaid]
__________________________________________________
03.

[Star Trek: The Next Generation]
__________________________________________________
04.

[Team Fortress 2 and The Adventures of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert]
__________________________________________________
05.

[Fresh Meat]
__________________________________________________
06.

[Attack on Titan / Shingeki no kyojin]
__________________________________________________
07.

[Skin Horse]
__________________________________________________
08.

[Jon Richardson/Sarah Millican]
__________________________________________________
09.

[Elementary]
__________________________________________________
10.

[Saint Young Men]
__________________________________________________
11.

[Game of Thrones]
__________________________________________________
12.

[Arrested Development]
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 052 secrets from Secret Submission Post #367.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:20 am (UTC)(link)I'm seeing a small problem or two with your argument here.
Make snide jokes about our supposed repression and our class system - yours is still alive and well; make another "white trash" joke and then say otherwise - but don't call us backwards.
We may have had some stupid Prime Ministers, but our people never allowed George Bush into power. We may have a traditional monarchy, but their power is most certainly waning.
I'm not usually a patriot, but damn, this makes me want to write a sternly-worded letter. I don't care if you're trolling, I needed to say this. We may do it fondly, but Brits regard America as the embarrassing cousin nobody invites to weddings.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:23 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:27 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:31 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:41 am (UTC)(link)(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:49 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:28 am (UTC)(link)just goes to prove that British society as a whole is still enormously hypocritical, but then I guess that's why you guys were so successful at conquering, murdering, and stealing from most of the world for so long. because you're vicious lying murderers.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:50 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 03:12 am (UTC)(link)no subject
What about the US's long and nasty history with slavery, which was abolished decades before in Britain than in the US? What about the US's backwards-ass current social policies in comparison to Britain? And even with all that, the US is still more progressive than many places (even if it's behind the curve with the western world). Britain is several steps ahead of us...I don't get how you can call them "backwards" tbh.
Try looking at what the country and its people are TODAY, not in history. If you do that, you'll find enormous faults with just about everyone.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 03:12 am (UTC)(link)that said, i think it's pretty rich of you to call me out for looking at the past, when that's literally exactly what the post i was replying to did. i don't think the US is perfect - i think it's deeply, deeply flawed, with a long history of repression and injustice and conquest and colonialism, which i reject and i criticize. but what does grind my gears is seeing someone from a country with a strong, rich history of oppression and injustice and conquest criticize the US & defend Britain in a way that completely elides every bit of that history, simply ignores it and leaves it behind in favor of self-righteous condemnation.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-15 04:23 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:52 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 03:07 am (UTC)(link)listen, i'm not saying America is or was fantastic. but it seems to me incredibly hypocritical for a Brit to talk about how America's history means that it's backwards and evil, while managing to completely ignore the deep, totally fucked history of the British doing awful shit. it's completely ridiculous.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-15 03:53 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-15 03:57 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-01-15 04:26 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 03:05 am (UTC)(link)Its appalling history of genocide and fact that it took decades longer than us to abolish slavery and started a civil war over it means that America is progressive.
it would be one thing if it was just present day events. but i would hope that, when referring to the past, the massive history of heinous, evil shit Britain has done would have given the person who started this subthread pause before talking about the past misdeeds of America. but nope, it's "look at how awful the evil, unevolved Americans are! unlike us Brits, lovable and cheeky, eh wot, never done a thing wrong, sun never sets on the glorious British empire, uplifting the savages." fucking shit. it's almost unbelievable, in the sheer arrogance of it.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:58 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 05:53 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 01:58 am (UTC)(link)Wait what? Some states have very, very strict limitations, but they allow them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-15 03:20 am (UTC)(link)What this means is that, instead of forming third parties and then building coalitions in Parliament, American political groups build coalitions on the party level and the election level. So, to put this in practical terms, where in the UK you have unions and labour groups forming a third party, in in the US, labor groups and unions were absorbed pretty quickly into the Democratic Party and it became more or less the party of the unions (along with immigrants, minorities, women, and before 1948 or so, Southerners). It's true that there's no Labour Party but it's not because the Labour Party constituency never existed - it's because politics just don't work the same way.
That said, it's true that there have been substantive differences in the historical course of the representation of the thing - I would say that's because America is just fundamentally a more populist country than the UK, in a lot of ways. And it's also true that the unions have declined in power over the last 30 years or so, but then you could also say that about the UK and the modern Labour Party, Tony Blair not exactly being the favorite child of the hardcore socialists.