case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-01-18 03:10 pm

[ SECRET POST #2573 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2573 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 073 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-01-18 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Just want to politely request people not start arguments about House of Leaves again so soon after the last one, right?

Anyway, about House of Leaves vs. Only Revolutions -- I love HoL, and OR is a bunch of pretentious unreadable bullshit. Someone said something last time that pretty much sums it up -- OR is proof that Mark Z. Danielewski believes his own hype following HoL's success.

Give HoL a try -- I promise it's an actual book, if a super-weird one in terms of formatting and narrative -- and not just shitty poetry.
Edited 2014-01-18 21:09 (UTC)

(Anonymous) 2014-01-18 09:34 pm (UTC)(link)
...dare I ask what happened? I don't remember that.....
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-01-18 09:36 pm (UTC)(link)
You didn't miss much. Just another dumb argument. It was about a week ago.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-19 04:35 am (UTC)(link)
Argument? You mean, people saying it's overrated? That wasn't an argument, that was people talking about a book.

Plus, you are not the person to advocate avoiding arguments. You stir up shit all the time, lest we forget what happens whenever anyone mentions Questionable Content around you.
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-01-19 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
And yet here you are bringing it up and here I am not giving a shit, what now?

(Anonymous) 2014-01-19 04:40 am (UTC)(link)
AYRT

The anon above IS NOT ME. Dude above me, chill, bro.
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-01-19 04:44 am (UTC)(link)
I figured that much based on the sudden sharp change in tone. Also the "LOL DETHTOLL YOU'RE A JERK" bit. Don't worry. :)
Edited 2014-01-19 04:44 (UTC)
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2014-01-19 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
People got very and needlessly aggressive at someone saying they liked House of Leaves.

(Anonymous) 2014-01-21 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
Nobody was "aggressive" toward anyone saying they liked House of Leaves. They were understandably pissed off by Dethtoll and others (including you, as I recall) insinuating, or saying outright, that those who hadn't liked it weren't intelligent enough to get it.
arcadiaego: Grey, cartoon cat Pusheen being petted (Default)

[personal profile] arcadiaego 2014-01-21 03:25 pm (UTC)(link)
Nope, not me. Plenty of people got angry about it though.
anarchicq: (Penance/Chamber OT-FUCKIN-P)

[personal profile] anarchicq 2014-01-19 12:06 am (UTC)(link)
That was me! I thought he believed his own hype!
Yay, my words stick with people!
dethtoll: (Default)

[personal profile] dethtoll 2014-01-19 04:48 am (UTC)(link)
They do!