fandomsecrets | [ SECRET POST #2577 ]

⌈ Secret Post #2577 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.

__________________________________________________

02.

[Theresa Lopez-Fitzgerald-Crane, from the soap opera Passions]

__________________________________________________

03.

[BBC Sherlock]

__________________________________________________

04.

[Nobunaga the Fool]

__________________________________________________

05.

[Carrie Fisher as Princess Leia from Star Wars]

__________________________________________________

06.

[The Quick and the Dead]

__________________________________________________

07.

[Nathan Fillion]

__________________________________________________

08.

[Warehouse 13]

__________________________________________________

09.

__________________________________________________

10.

Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 030 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Using a poem has nothing to do with nazis. Try harder.

...are you for real?

Anon was just using the poem structure because it's a nice one and you can easily change it to adapt it to other situations. Like the "roses are red, violets are blue" one.

it's a poem that is pretty famously about the Nazis and they said it had nothing to do with the Nazis

lol @ everything

It's a derivative work:

"In copyright law, a derivative work is an expressive creation that includes major, copyright-protected elements of an original, previously created first work (the underlying work). The derivative work become a second, separate work independent in form from the first."

Notice the last line. Independent.

lol wtf are you quoting law for. this is not a question of law. it might be legally independent, but a reasonable person, seeing the poem is so clearly referencing the specific poem, could legitimately think that the writer was intending to reference the original poem's context. and honestly, i think it's more difficult to imagine they weren't intending to reference it. it really is a pretty specific allusion.

what

what

too beautiful

[ SECRET POST #2577 ]

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.

Re: From 0 to Godwin's in ten comments or less.