[ SECRET POST #2579 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2579 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________
















[ ----- SPOILERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]


















15. [SPOILERS for Shingeki No Kyojin / Attack On Titan]



__________________________________________________



16. [SPOILERS for A Series of Unfortunate Events]




















[ ----- TRIGGERY SECRETS AHEAD ----- ]

















__________________________________________________


17. [WARNING for child sexual abuse]



__________________________________________________


18. [WARNING for pedophilia]

[The Venture Bros.]





















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 00 pages, 000 secrets from Secret Submission Post #368.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

Uh, yeah. She's not being kept alive because of 'pro-choice', she's being kept alive because of anti-abortion laws. So, unsure of what you're driving at? Pretty sure Pro-life never bids itself as pro-choice, lol.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

OP's argument is that she was taken off life-support because of 'pro-choice', not that she's being kept alive because of it. OP is driving at the argument that the woman should be kept alive but that the pro-choice movement wants her taken off life support and this is deeply contradictory and wrong. As far as I can tell.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

....But the woman never wanted to be on life support? And her baby was so deformed that it most likely wouldn't have survived anyway? No life was saved by keeping her on LS.

Re: When pro-choice is anti-life

[(Anonymous)]

Even some of the writers of the damn law that was keeping her on LS said the law shouldn't have applied to this case.