Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-01-28 06:56 pm
[ SECRET POST #2583 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2583 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 043 secrets from Secret Submission Post #369.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:08 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Some people really have trouble grasping the idea that other people do fandom differently from them.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:21 am (UTC)(link)/dweeb
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:20 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 02:11 am (UTC)(link)...this is OOC?
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:26 am (UTC)(link)Re: ...this is OOC?
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:07 am (UTC)(link)Unless he did, but was embarrassed and therefore left that part out of his stories...<_<
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:34 am (UTC)(link)*ahem* what were you saying about the pleasure of exaggeration again? ;)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 12:47 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:15 am (UTC)(link)---
"To the man who loves art for its own sake," remarked Sherlock Holmes, tossing aside the advertisement sheet of the Daily Telegraph, "it is frequently in its least important and lowliest manifestations that the keenest pleasure is to be derived. It is pleasant to me to observe, Watson, that you have so far grasped this truth that in these little records of our cases which you have been good enough to draw up, and, I am bound to say, occasionally to embellish, you have given prominence not so much to the many causes celebres and sensational trials in which I have figured but rather to those incidents which may have been trivial in themselves, but which have given room for those faculties of deduction and of logical synthesis which I have made my special province."
"And yet," said I, smiling, "I cannot quite hold myself absolved from the charge of sensationalism which has been urged against my records."
"You have erred, perhaps," he observed, taking up a glowing cinder with the tongs and lighting with it the long cherry-wood pipe which was wont to replace his clay when he was in a disputatious rather than a meditative mood --"you have erred perhaps in attempting to put color and life into each of your statements instead of confining yourself to the task of placing upon record that severe reasoning from cause to effect which is really the only notable feature about the thing."
"It seems to me that I have done you full justice in the matter," I remarked with some coldness, for I was repelled by the egotism which I had more than once observed to be a strong factor in my friend's singular character.
"No, it is not selfishness or conceit," said he, answering, as was his wont, my thoughts rather than my words. "If I claim full justice for my art, it is because it is an impersonal thing -- a thing beyond myself. Crime is common. Logic is rare. Therefore it is upon the logic rather than upon the crime that you should dwell. You have degraded what should have been a course of lectures into a series of tales."
---
So more cold anger than tears, really.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:25 am (UTC)(link)“I glanced over it,” said he. “Honestly, I cannot congratulate you upon it. Detection is, or ought to be, an exact science and should be treated in the same cold and unemotional manner. You have attempted to tinge it with romanticism, which produces much the same effect as if you worked a love-story or an elopement into the fifth proposition of Euclid.”
“But the romance was there,” I remonstrated. “I could not tamper with the facts.”
“Some facts should be suppressed, or, at least, a just sense of proportion should be observed in treating them. The only point in the case which deserved mention was the curious analytical reasoning from effects to causes, by which I succeeded in unravelling it.”
I was annoyed at this criticism of a work which had been specially designed to please him. I confess, too, that I was irritated by the egotism which seemed to demand that every line of my pamphlet should be devoted to his own special doings. More than once during the years that I had lived with him in Baker Street I had observed that a small vanity underlay my companion’s quiet and didactic manner.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 01:31 am (UTC)(link)"small" vanity ahahahahahaha Watson I don't know if you're being too kind or just sarcastic, but I love it either way.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 11:54 am (UTC)(link)(Also going awwww for Watson. His writing was 'specially designed to please' Holmes.)
no subject
As a writer I strive for canonicity and IC characters and those are the stories I end up loving most as a reader. But those OOC stories just do something for me in a way the others don't. They're often melodramatic and angst focused in a way that scratches my id. And some of them have really interesting plots and world building almost like the author blew their wad on that and had nothing left over for characterization.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-29 02:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
I think I just proved your point. ;)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-01-30 05:35 am (UTC)(link)