case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-03 06:32 pm
  • Add Memory
  • Share This Entry

[ SECRET POST #2589 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2589 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 084 secrets from Secret Submission Post #370.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Re: jarpad and Philip Seymour Hoffman

(Anonymous) 2014-02-03 11:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Did you really decide to drag this wank to FS then go back and find an old wank thread just so you could high-horse it up over some potential people that may or may not exist? And make it the first comment in GC?

I don't even have an opinion on the death but like just. Really?

Re: jarpad and Philip Seymour Hoffman

[personal profile] cbrachyrhynchos 2014-02-04 12:00 am (UTC)(link)
Grudgewank is grudgy.
(reply from suspended user)

Re: jarpad and Philip Seymour Hoffman

(Anonymous) 2014-02-04 12:13 am (UTC)(link)
...preemptive, or peremptory...?
(reply from suspended user)

Re: jarpad and Philip Seymour Hoffman

(Anonymous) 2014-02-04 12:08 am (UTC)(link)
Like someone said above, it's grudgewanky and only drags in past wank into the new wank, culminating in even more wank than there would have been. Especially if you drag the past wank in with a completely sanctimonious attitude of your own that's calling out hypocrites- that may or may not exist- but in the case they do, they are hypocrites! You're calling it early! Hypocrites (maybe)!

I feel it's in bad taste.
Flat | Top-Level Comments Only