[ SECRET POST #2591 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2591 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.


__________________________________________________



16.


__________________________________________________



17.


__________________________________________________



18.


__________________________________________________



19.











Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 046 secrets from Secret Submission Post #370.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

SA

[(Anonymous)]

Though re-reading the secret, actually I DON'T think I've come across the stuff you listed. More like you interpreted it very differently from what I did. For example: "a man telling a woman her appearance, etc." to you = automatically sexist, context be damned; to me = the context of the story presents said woman as objectively needing a makeover, so she's doing good by listening to the guy's advice. There's nothing inherently sexist about that.
Same for many others. "The constant assumption that everyone wants children"... the story isn't trying to think for you, nor should you be trying to think for the characters. The characters in the story want children? Cool, I want children too someday. You don't, OP? That's fine, it's a story, not The Manual™ to life. I hope the point I'm trying to make is clear to anyone reading since I don't want to turn this into a wall of text.
I do still think you should find another job however, you don't sound like you're suited for this one.

Re: SA again

[(Anonymous)]

Yeah OP, sorry but after some thinking I strongly suspect you're twisting things and making them out to be something they're not. Wouldn't be the first time I've seen that happen, sadly.

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

"objectively needing a makeover"

lol

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

That's what established canons are, anon.

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

"Objectively" needing a makeover? No one NEEDS anything that is not required to keep them alive. You saying that there are situations in which women objectively need makeovers is basically saying that appealing to some asshole's standards of attractiveness is essential to her survival. Just... WTF?

There are some things that context does not excuse. Misogyny presented as normal and right is one of those things. Sorry to burst your bubble, douchebag.

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

Why do sjws always have so many problems with following a simple discourse and basic reading comprehension?

Re: SA

[diet_poison]

You think this is an SJW...? wha

Re: SA

[(Anonymous)]

the context of the story presents said woman as objectively needing a makeover, so she's doing good by listening to the guy's advice

That moves the blame from the characters to the story. It doesn't help the story.