Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-08 03:39 pm
[ SECRET POST #2594 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2594 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 094 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
[ 1 - not!fandom ]
nf
But yeah, agreed. I can see how ableism can be a real problem (people not taking mental illnesses seriously and so on) but words like 'dumb' being ableist? That's just a lot of whining to me.
Re: nf
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)Re: nf
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 02:07 am (UTC)(link)Re: nf
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 02:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:23 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 09:52 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
On a side note, the biggest ablism kerfuffle I've seen was the Derpy thing, in which two groups of people with seemingly identical values accused EACH OTHER of being ablist. One side pretty much fell in love with Derpy, and was pissed that people were trying to remove a "positive depiction of a disabled person." The other side compared her to a minstrel in blackface, and was pissed that the first side wanted to keep an "offensive portrayal of a disabled person." It's fine to disagree on what's positive and what's offensive, but when you're calling people bigots for, essentially, agreeing with the ideas you want to promote, it's time to take a step back and reevaluate what you're doing.
as a legit PWD my response is this
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 11:45 pm (UTC)(link)...it's a cartoon depiction of a plastic horse with wings...
...it's a cartoon depiction of a plastic horse with wings...
*flips table*
no subject
I'm probably going to regret posting this, as it may be a while before I have internet access again and won't be able to see any replies (if any), much less respond. Eh, what the hell.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-08 10:14 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-10 01:44 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 07:44 am (UTC)(link)NF
(Anonymous) 2014-02-09 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)