case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-09 03:54 pm

[ SECRET POST #2595 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2595 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 078 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

(Anonymous) 2014-02-10 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
Once they're past consent but while they're still stupid and young. That's when vampires would strike, because that's when most sexual predators prefer to strike.

On the other hand, would most vampires care about ages of consent? They suck people's blood to live, why stop there?

I have no idea why I'm replying now except that I generally dislike vampires in fiction. They could be so much better if the story just accepted them as irredeemable thugs. But then there would be no dramatic tension so they wouldn't get written at all.