case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-10 06:55 pm

[ SECRET POST #2596 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2596 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.
[Star Trek: The Next Generation]


__________________________________________________



03.
[The Croods]


__________________________________________________



04.
[Elementary]


__________________________________________________



05.
[Final Fantasy XIII]


__________________________________________________



06.
[SCP Foundation]


__________________________________________________



07.
[Philip Seymour Hoffman]


__________________________________________________



08.
[Twin Peaks]


__________________________________________________



09.
[Richard Armitage]


__________________________________________________



10.
[Reign]


__________________________________________________



11.
[The Hobbit]


__________________________________________________



12.
[Hunger Games]


__________________________________________________



13.
[Don't Hug Me I'm Scared]


__________________________________________________



14.
[Teen Wolf]


__________________________________________________



15.
[Panic! at The Disco/Dallon Weekes]















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
starphotographs: (Stein (being earnestly pedantic))

Re: Secret #1: Manic Pixie Girl

[personal profile] starphotographs 2014-02-11 04:54 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I'm bothered by the backlash to that character type, too.

There are a lot of usually-flat characters out there. Valiant heroes of pure pureness! Gritty anti-heros! Princesses! Hell, the unassuming dudes that fall for MPDGs qualify, too. But the complaints about those types are more along the lines of "write it better and give them unique traits beyond the obvious!" When people complain about MPDGs, there's this weird sense that they want them wiped off the map completely. It's weird!

And you know, I even think there's a correct way to write the relationships that MPDGs often become part of. Hell, I've seen it done! (...Carl and Ellie from UP!)

Re: Secret #1: Manic Pixie Girl

(Anonymous) 2014-02-11 05:03 am (UTC)(link)
ayrt

Ya know, I think that might be the crux of my problem. There are a lot of "types," and they cut across genders, but it's this one particular type that seems to get singled out (of late, anyway. It certainly hasn't always been, nor will it always be). There's a reason these types exist, and it's not necessarily bad or wrong, and people can actually relate to some of those types (if they couldn't, then they wouldn't pop up so often and be so compelling).

Re: Secret #1: Manic Pixie Girl

(Anonymous) 2014-02-11 05:10 am (UTC)(link)
As people have said - the 'type' that a lot of people are criticizing isn't necesssarily the same as the 'type' that you're defending