case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-11 06:38 pm

[ SECRET POST #2597 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2597 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - titc ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
insanenoodlyguy: (Default)

[personal profile] insanenoodlyguy 2014-02-12 12:02 am (UTC)(link)
You're wrong and your right. Obviously fanon has done worse.

But making it romantic does without doubt ruin the message. You're saying it's not the point, but it was. The whole fucking point of the thing was to show that NON-ROMANTIC LOVE CAN BE TRUE LOVE. That's why we had not one but two red herring romance plots that, while resolved, didn't save the day.

You alter that, you alter everything. I'm not saying you can't. But don't say you aren't!

(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
This. Completely.
kallanda_lee: (Default)

[personal profile] kallanda_lee 2014-02-12 12:16 am (UTC)(link)
Basically this. I mean, I'm okay with people fantasizing about stuff or even writing AU versions of it, but if you somehow try to shoehorn it into canon then yes, you're completely changing the message and missing the point.

OP

(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:38 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I don't even know. I sort of want to pretend I was high when I wrote this. I think I meant more the fandom's reaction to shipping them beyond the movie? Like, canon is definitely not about romantic love, and...

Yep, I don't know. I done fucked up.
ozaline: (Default)

Re: OP

[personal profile] ozaline 2014-02-12 07:51 am (UTC)(link)
I think I got what you were going for, "Romantic Love and Platonic Love are on the same level so it doesn't matter if they're gay for each other or not!" Which is the movie's position but reversed. I get it, and I get the live and let live approach... but yeah in Disney land the example of platonic love needed to be set. (Well Once Upon a Time had a platonic True Love's Kiss at the end of season one... hopefully no one ships THAT)

(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 09:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes given Disney has taken so long to get this message across, I agree with you, it's a shame to think that fandom have in fact cheapened it, and missed the point as well.