Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-11 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2597 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2597 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - titc ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:34 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:43 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:48 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:56 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 01:01 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 01:14 am (UTC)(link)I gave up on shipping years ago because of this and it's refreshing to see in this thread that smut is becoming more versatile then I thought it was. Back in 2006-2008 when I was a more active shipper, it really got on my nerves that it was so "they're more girly so they have to bottom and they're more manly so they have to top, no exceptions."
no subject
Doo dah, doo dah
This highlights the heteronormative sexist nature of most fangirl slash
All the doo dah day
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 09:02 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 09:12 am (UTC)(link)not saying i agree with AYRT but this argument is kinda BS
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 09:43 am (UTC)(link)I hate this argument and I think it's bullshit. Not only it equates femaleness with being adorable, but it also equates bottoming with being a woman. What OP thinks is what other people think is really what they think and project onto others. When I see an adorable man, no matter what sexual position he's in, my thought isn't "what a woman!".