Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-11 06:38 pm
[ SECRET POST #2597 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2597 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 047 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ], [ 1 - titc ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 12:49 am (UTC)(link)Although ... I'd be okay if Fili and Kili survived, maybe. In the book, their deaths were largely to set up the era of peace by removing the direct line of succession and thus forcing the likes of Dain and Bard to work together in their absence and inspired by their sacrifice. Maybe that wouldn't be necessary in the movies.
But Thorin has to die. He really, really does. Everything that happens between him and Bilbo over the Arkenstone is what sets up Bilbo to be the hobbit who resists the Ring for decades afterwards, and Thorin's last words directly salute Bilbo for being able to resist the lure of gold and making the world merrier for it. Thorin's death is what shows Bilbo the price of gold lust, and I honestly believe it's why Bilbo, of all the Ring-bearers, was the one who was capable of simply giving it up on demand, even after decades of its influence. Thorin's death, his struggles and his madness and his dying redemption, were part of what shaped the War of the Ring. Even leaving aside how much I just want the tragic emotional payoff at the end, I also think that Bilbo wouldn't have been the hobbit he was later if it wasn't for Thorin and Thorin's end, and I wouldn't want to lose that.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 03:06 am (UTC)(link)I also think that Thorin has to die for dramatic story-arc reasons, if nothing else.
And do you guys remember the (non-canonical) scene in the first movie where unconscious Thorin gets picked up and carried away by the eagle (the part that would have been "fifteen birds in five fir-trees" in the books)? I am 100% positive that's foreshadowing.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-12 02:07 pm (UTC)(link)no subject