case: (Default)
Case ([personal profile] case) wrote in [community profile] fandomsecrets2014-02-12 06:40 pm

[ SECRET POST #2598 ]


⌈ Secret Post #2598 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
But this is the Internet, not real life. No one will be hurt because two kids spend 2 hours discussing if atheists are dicks or religious people are the ones that are shit. If they are bored and want to waste their life doing this, let them be.
lynx: (Default)

Re: Coup d'état

[personal profile] lynx 2014-02-13 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
There are a lot of us who're very grateful to you and like your way of modding, Case. Someone already mentioned their preference in freezing vs. deleting, which I was going to point, so I'll only add that the comparison to a club is quite accurate.

Disagreeing and posting controversial, thought-provoking things, is great and we've had a lot of those threads. But some people don't seem to grasp that humoring a thread that will just get others hurt with no purpose beyond that is entirely another bag of dicks (pun intended :/)
tabaqui: (Default)

Re: Coup d'état

[personal profile] tabaqui 2014-02-13 04:53 am (UTC)(link)
Hear, hear! I totally agree.
lynx: (Default)

Re: Coup d'état

[personal profile] lynx 2014-02-13 05:00 am (UTC)(link)
There's no such thing as a safe space on the Internet, but Case provides us with an enjoyable one. I'm not even saying "nice", because it's the Internet! But yeah, it's a place where we can have our fun, and different kinds of fun even, which means:

- It's Case's space and he makes the rules.
- It's an enjoyable place, and we all should collaborate to keep it so.
- If Case deems there's something making his "club" less enjoyable and annoying the other "patrons", he has the right to nip that before it becomes a brawl.

The only completely unmodded places are in the Deep Web, jeeze. Even 4chan kicks people out sometimes.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
There are real living people on the other end of the computer, and if you don't think spending hours throwing insults at each other isn't having an impact on their lives I don't know what to tell you. But I don't see anything productive coming from endless back and forth over who is more shitty.

If nothing else, it stretches the page and is irritating to scroll past.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
But the thing is that no one is forcing them to do it! They can stop at any time and leave the thread. There has been nights when I was so bored that I spent hours shitposting and "fighting" with people on the Internet. We both knew that we were just trolling each other, nothing wrong there.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
nayrt

Yeah, and if someone is yelling out vile things and walking around trying to start pointless drama and arguments at a party I can always leave. But the point is it ruins the atmosphere and most people at the party don't appreciate it and would be very happy to see that party ruiner shut down.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:58 am (UTC)(link)
DON'T FEED THE TROLL.

Is it that hard to understand? This isn't the 90s anymore, for god's sake. If someone is trolling or shitposting, ignore them. Otherwise you're even worse than them because if you continue replying they will continue trolling. Ignore them and they'll get bored and will stop.

1)HIDE
2)IGNORE
3)REPORT

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 02:01 am (UTC)(link)
We both knew that we were just trolling each other
You can't always be sure about that.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
Then the other person is brain dead. Subtle trolling is pretty hard, most of the time is clear as daylight when someone is trolling.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:24 am (UTC)(link)
The internet is real life. Do you think you're discussing things with computers in some sort of void?

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:28 am (UTC)(link)
Most of the time when I post here it's not the real me but my Internet persona that is based on me but it isn't me. Real me wouldn't waste their time writing this.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 02:02 am (UTC)(link)
...You just did.

Re: Coup d'état

(Anonymous) 2014-02-13 01:21 pm (UTC)(link)
See, you missed the point.