[ SECRET POST #2598 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2598 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________



12.


__________________________________________________



13.


__________________________________________________



14.


__________________________________________________



15.















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 031 secrets from Secret Submission Post #371.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 1 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

In my case, I don't care that the porn exists, just that it's so easily accessible to children when it comes to some of these fandoms.

I know there will always be some stuff that slips through the cracks, but when multiple Rule 34 results pop up on your basic Google search of a character from a children's show even with Safe Search on, it's time to rein the fandom in a bit and clean up (as in, making sure people are locking up the porn).

I have been hearing about semi-organized events for fans to clean up Safe Search results in their respective fandoms. Hopefully these become a commonplace thing.

[starphotographs]

I kind of feel like that's always been the case too, though? I know I ran across similar stuff when I first went online, and that was in the very early 2000s, when images in general were a lot harder to search for.

I've heard of the Safe Search cleanup thing before. Something about it bugs me, but I can't articulate it and am probably just overthinking things, so don't mind me. :P

AYRT

[(Anonymous)]

Oh, I also remember running across that stuff when I was first online (mid-late 90s in my case), but that's precisely why I thought it was great that Google, when it came along, had a Safe Search option for kids and people at work and why I agree with the general idea of the cleanup - because Safe Search has always been intended to be SFW. When it comes to people who say to go into the non-Safe Search area and clean that up too, that part does bug me, because usually when one has Safe Search off, they're actually searching for these things, which is an entirely different situation.