Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-15 03:32 pm
[ SECRET POST #2601 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2601 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

__________________________________________________
15.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 098 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 01:25 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:07 pm (UTC)(link)Yes maybe it means we're still struggling in the battle for equality, but why bring them down when they've had everyday people bringing them down all their lives?
Criticize ONTD all you want, but being nice to two amazing ladies? I don't really think that's something ONTD is doing wrong.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)THERE ARE FORTY BAJILLION POPES RUNNING AROUND OUT THERE OK. ROFL
(no subject)
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)That place is so hilariously predictable when it comes to naming their flawless queens and men who should die in a fire.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:09 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 01:32 am (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 04:24 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 02:33 am (UTC)(link)It's all kind of ridiculous when you get into generalizations about sites with thousands of users and a handful of trolls. I like ONTD but I stay out of wank bait threads and ignore trolls, everyone I talk to is super nice.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-16 04:01 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-16 04:22 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:14 pm (UTC)(link)I was trying to find the video for the high scoring us women snowboarder and ran across a bunch of shitty 50 hottest women Olympians articles.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 09:22 pm (UTC)(link)Also, they have hottest olympic male athletes every year. Amazingly, writing articles about who is hot does not take away from other articles about other this. They are not a finite source.
(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-15 21:25 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-15 21:28 (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-15 21:29 (UTC) - Expandda
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-15 22:20 (UTC) - ExpandRe: da
(Anonymous) - 2014-02-15 22:34 (UTC) - Expandno subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 10:17 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)Yeah
(Anonymous) 2014-02-15 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-16 02:31 am (UTC)(link)I do not care who's hot or not in the mind of a random article author, honestly - everyone has their own opinion. Gossip portals never made sense in this to me - aaand they of course judge women in general.
But yep, they're a bunch of hypocrites.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-20 06:26 am (UTC)(link)