Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-02-23 03:55 pm
[ SECRET POST #2609 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2609 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
12.

__________________________________________________
13.

__________________________________________________
14.

Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 04 pages, 076 secrets from Secret Submission Post #372.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
And while they might not be nice secrets - and I don't think they are - I don't think I can ban them for the reason of "not being secrets," since it's been proven pretty much over and over again that if someone mentions that they think a popular actor is ugly, fans will judge the hell out of them for it. (While I'm sure they also have people they think are ugly, too.)
If there's some huge influx of "omg so ugly" secrets soon or something, then sure, it might be ugly-anon trolling - but it's just one today. I'll keep an eye out, anyway.
no subject
I really don't think hatefully judging someone by their physical appearance is really something we should be enabling. Judge their actions, their poor choices in partners, their style of dress, anything they have control over, but shitting on someone for how they look is unsporting at best.
no subject
#2 today has more than "SO UGLY" though, so that rule even analogy-wise, doesn't really apply.
And I don't think we have leg to stand on re: the "enabling" argument, considering what gets posted here on Fridays...
no subject
I don't get it -- we make a big deal about personal attacks over in general comments and in secret threads but we're perfectly fine with these shallow, hurtful secrets?
Whatever, maybe I'll just shut up.
no subject
Like, if a kid in a classroom punches another kid, the teacher has to stop them, right? But if they're drawing a mustache and writing "ewww gross idiot" on a picture of Justin Timberlake, well that's weird, but it'd also be weird to ban him from doing that if he wants to.
Now if that picture were of the kid who sits next to him, there'd be issues, or if the kid that sat next to him were for some reason Justin Timberlake, there'd be issues. But until then, banning something "because it's shallow" wouldn't be a good idea.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 10:24 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
I'm not responsible for defending Billie Piper in the event that someone calls her ugly, though. I am responsible for stopping it if it happens to a user here, that's all. If Billie Piper were here and hurt by it, I'd take it down.
no subject
And yes, that includes ones like today's.
no subject
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-02-23 11:27 pm (UTC)(link)no subject
no subject
http://fandomsecrets.dreamwidth.org/967028.html?thread=724169076#cmt724169076
no subject