[ SECRET POST #2616 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2616 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: When did kink-shaming come back into vogue

[(Anonymous)]

It depends on the kink honestly. There's kinks I believe are disturbing (non-con and fics where one of the characters is underage), and so do a lot of fans, so while the people who are fine with them would consider disparaging them kink shaming, people who think like I do wouldn't.

Re: When did kink-shaming come back into vogue

[(Anonymous)]

But there's a huge difference between saying "I hate non-con" and "You like non-con? You are disgusting, there's something wrong with you, way to contribute to rape culture" etc.

What do you mean by disparaging? Disparaging fans of non-con? I would say that is pretty dickish, to attack anyone because of a kink. Unless it's like, something they do in real life, obviously.