[ SECRET POST #2616 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2616 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07.


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 063 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

Re: Defriending: Announce or don't announce?

[(Anonymous)]

I don't understand what is it you see shallow about reverse cuts.

That way you can filter people that want to stay in touch, from old abandoned journals and people you used to share fandoms with but drifted apart. Nothing shallow about it.

Re: Defriending: Announce or don't announce?

[dimestoresaint]

I'm not the OP, but it comes off as shallow to me because it's sort of like saying "Come beg me to keep you as a friend." Either you want to stay in touch with someone or you don't; the fact that they've added you and kept you on their flist obviously means they already want to stay in touch with you, so why make them take that extra step? It just seems kind of attention-whorey to me.

Re: Defriending: Announce or don't announce?

[(Anonymous)]

+1