Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-03 07:07 pm
[ SECRET POST #2617 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2617 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
As a note, social justice is not a fandom. Tumblr itself is not a fandom.
Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 051 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 1 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Re: Based on #2
Re: Based on #2
Re: Based on #2
Re: Based on #2
And in a sense, polyamory doesn't even have to go in defiance of canon. Given our culture, most polyamorists in the real world probably started out with a similar strong stance towards monogamy, but then warmed up to the idea of polyamory over time. Most of the polyamorous fic I've read (that isn't just 'slice of life' type things) involve at least one character being in a similar situation, of preferring monogamy and needing to warm up to the idea of polyamory.
So while I can understand a simple preference for pairings over OT3s or moresomes, I can't really wrap my mind around why a prestated stance on monogamy would be relevant when you are reading or writing fanfic that, most often, already goes against canon in some capacity anyway.
Re: Based on #2
I'm not sure my sample size is very large, but for most of the poly friends I have I'd have to disagree with the "warming up to it" idea. They've all been very outside the box kind of people since high school with strong opinions about how marriage and relationships and love should work... but I guess that's an impression subject to my own biases, and it need not necessarily work that way.
Also relevant to this discussion is that I don't tend to ship something unless there's a level of interaction in canon that's highly suggestive or outright stated. A lot of my ships are actually canon ships, especially when it comes to heterosexual pairings.
Re: Based on #2
okay i see this is where the misunderstanding is happening because "highly suggestive" is highly subjective
I would elaborate on this but I am WWASTED and just wanted to make that...well it's not a pun exactly but? i just wanted to say that thing
Re: Based on #2
Yeaah girl get yo drank on!Re: Based on #2
And perhaps the fact I'm looking at this from primarily book-and-movie fandoms is why I'm not entirely getting your viewpoint. If you're working from video games, though, it makes a bit more sense why you might end up shipping all pairs by chance (though not the preference) - if your romances are pre-set by game mechanics, then yeah, I can see how there's not much wiggle room to expand to include a third person. Additionally, almost none of my ships are canon, and really most of the popular ships I'm familiar with are not only not canon, but often between characters who either have never met or only barely met in canon, hence my confusion about why canon-stated preferences or interaction matter in shipping.
Re: Based on #2
Oh man I would probably have more book ships if school hadn't totally destroyed my will to read for pleasure for like ten years. Thanks for reminding me how sad I am about that.
Really despite my own shipping style, I really don't mind what other people ship. If someone ships because they wanna make two hot bodies hump each other, that's totally fine lol.