[ SECRET POST #2618 ]

[case]

⌈ Secret Post #2618 ⌋

Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.

01.


__________________________________________________



02.


__________________________________________________



03.


__________________________________________________



04.


__________________________________________________



05.


__________________________________________________



06.


__________________________________________________



07. [tb]


__________________________________________________



08.


__________________________________________________



09.


__________________________________________________



10.


__________________________________________________



11.


__________________________________________________
















Notes:

Secrets Left to Post: 02 pages, 039 secrets from Secret Submission Post #374.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 0 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

Comments

[sarillia]

Lately there have been some strange arguments about slut-shaming in complaints of these things. Which makes no sense because these are fictional characters with no autonomy that is being affected by unfair societal pressures, but that doesn't stop those arguments.

[(Anonymous)]

I've actually gotten into those type of arguments on FS! before, where people were trying to talk about fictional characters being able to dress how they want and my reaction was mostly, "But they're fictional... they were created by a man... to please men..."

Like I understand the need to not judge how real women dress but ignoring the objectification of women just so you don't slut shame seems to take back the progress a bit.

[otakugal15]

I see that argument with Wonder Woman all the time. And in some cases, that argument works, depends on the artist and the writer. Other times? Even SHE is being drawn to titillate men.