Case (
case) wrote in
fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2623 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2623 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.

__________________________________________________
02.

__________________________________________________
03.

__________________________________________________
04.

__________________________________________________
05.

__________________________________________________
06.

__________________________________________________
07.

__________________________________________________
08.

__________________________________________________
09.

__________________________________________________
10.

__________________________________________________
11.

__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.

no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 01:30 am (UTC)(link)no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 04:40 am (UTC)(link)The thing is, it wouldn't have to be a "let minors look at porn" law. People manage to publish erotica without being sued on the off chance that their work will be read by a minor. BDSM communities and blogs manage to have frank, explicit conversations about human sexuality without being closed by irate parents. I'm just saying, a "you are not responsible for other people reading your work on the open internet" law would do, and it could be something that bloggers and the ACLU would want also.