Case (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
case) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
case) wrote in fandomsecrets2014-03-09 04:05 pm
[ SECRET POST #2623 ]
⌈ Secret Post #2623 ⌋
Warning: Some secrets are NOT worksafe and may contain SPOILERS.
01.
__________________________________________________
02.
__________________________________________________
03.
__________________________________________________
04.
__________________________________________________
05.
__________________________________________________
06.
__________________________________________________
07.
__________________________________________________
08.
__________________________________________________
09.
__________________________________________________
10.
__________________________________________________
11.
__________________________________________________
Notes:
Secrets Left to Post: 03 pages, 064 secrets from Secret Submission Post #375.
Secrets Not Posted: [ 0 - broken links ], [ 1 - not!secrets ], [ 0 - not!fandom ], [ 0 - too big ], [ 0 - repeat ].
Current Secret Submissions Post: here.
Suggestions, comments, and concerns should go here.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2014-03-10 04:40 am (UTC)(link)The thing is, it wouldn't have to be a "let minors look at porn" law. People manage to publish erotica without being sued on the off chance that their work will be read by a minor. BDSM communities and blogs manage to have frank, explicit conversations about human sexuality without being closed by irate parents. I'm just saying, a "you are not responsible for other people reading your work on the open internet" law would do, and it could be something that bloggers and the ACLU would want also.